The Risky Draft Declaration Debate… Reward Outweighs Risk

January 17, 2011

Read the opposing argument from Bleacher Fan.

Last Saturday was the deadline for underclassmen to declare for the NFL Draft. As usual, the list contains names of future stars in the NFL. While some decided to chase fortune and glory immediately, others – notably Stanford quarterback Andrew Luck – chose to return to college. What makes things interesting this year is the extremely unstable NFL labor situation that is quickly arising, and it certainly has all of us fretting over what our fall Sundays would be like without football. Nonetheless, it is a very real possibility, and that possibility is at the core of our debate today. What are the chances (or likelihood) of a lockout making it risky for all the underclassmen to go ahead and declare? But, you know what? I say it’s worth the risk.

It does appear that no single player is going to get guaranteed money like players of recent drafts. The translation is for the high draft picks not to expect to get Sam Bradford or Matthew Stafford money, with signing bonuses approaching $50M in guaranteed money. For the record, I think that’s a good thing and certainly hope that is a part of the new collective bargaining agreement. Who knows what a so-called rookie pay scale will be (similar to what the NBA currently has in place), but we do know it’ll be much more than what you’d make by playing another year in college. [Insert Cecil Newton jokes here]. Many are saying that it’s too risky financially. Please tell me why.

The NFL still plans on holding its draft on April 28 at Radio City Music Hall in New York City. That means we’ll still get to hear obnoxious Jets fans scream and yell when their team picks. These draft picks will eventually be able to sign their contracts. Underclassmen like Da’Quan Bowers and A.J. Green will be drafted and will eventually sign their rookie contracts. You can bet their agents will find a way to make sure they don’t go hungry, even through endorsements, autograph opportunities, or cash advances. These are all things that couldn’t be done if the kids were still lacing them up on Saturdays.

The same rookie pay scale that is likely going to be in place for the 2011 NFL season will be in place for next year’s crop of rookies also. So, the way I look at it is, this year’s guys are getting a head start. They are getting that rookie year out of the way, collecting that check, and perhaps more importantly, getting a year closer to that first free agent contract.

Then there’s always the risk that you either have an unproductive senior year or have an injury to curtail those NFL hopes and dreams. This time last year, it was almost a given that Jake Locker was going to be the top quarterback in this year’s draft, much the same way we are looking at Luck in regards to next year’s draft. Well, what happened? An up and down 2010 campaign for Locker cast serious doubt on his ability to play at the next level. Now he’s certain to be drafted behind underclassmen like Blaine Gabbert and Ryan Mallet. He essentially lost MILLIONS by returning to school and getting that degree.

It’s a cliché, but I am going to write it anyway. There’s risk in everything you do. But these guys have long had the dream of playing in the NFL and couldn’t pass up the opportunity. Many of the guys come from urban areas where they didn’t have much growing up and felt like they couldn’t pass up the big pay day. Now, they have to believe that the NFL labor situation will be resolved soon and they will become professional football players with bigger bank accounts. The reward certainly outweighs the risk in this situation.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Most Overrated Sporting Event Debate… The NFL Draft is Much Ado About Nothing

May 28, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Sports Geek .

My apologies to William Shakespeare, but not unlike a line from Macbeth, the NFL draft has become, “A tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”

The NFL Draft has morphed from a once unique and exciting experience to an overhyped, poorly executed spectacle. It has been dragged out into a grueling three day marathon which is pulled off with all the decorum and attention to detail of a fraternity keg party. All of NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell’s efforts to escalate the importance and media coverage of the event have in turn created an overblown, overexposed monster. The NFL Draft has become the most overhyped sporting event around.

Once the top few quarterbacks, running backs, and wide receivers come off the board, the entertainment diminishes exponentially. Sure, some important players are selected in the later rounds, but are they worth the hours of repetitive commentary and faulty predictions? No.

Plus, all this coverage boarders on triggering an overexposure induced backlash. Fans are already inundated with pre-draft specials, combine breakdowns, and expert analysis weeks in advance. This excessive promotion establishes unreachable expectations. With each commercial prompting fans to believe they will miss out on the selection of the next Peyton Manning if they miss a minute of the draft comes increased pressure for the NFL Draft to be much more entertaining. And when the fans do tune in expecting a big payoff, they are instead provided with “expert” analysis with all the accuracy of radar-less weatherman.

I would like to make it clear that I take nothing away from the challenge Commissioner Goodell faces. While other sports are trying to find ways to keep up with or catch professional football, he must often blaze his own trail to find previously unexplored ways to make the NFL more profitable. Unfortunately for the Commish (does anyone else immediately think of Michael Chiklis?), I believe that the league’s tinkering, and the excessive promotion of the draft, has gone a bit too far.

The NFL is making mistakes in trying to outdo itself. The whole situation reminds me of the problem of movie sequels. Many times film makers get so caught up in attempting to go bigger than the first movie that they forget about the elements of the original that made their product popular in the first place. Red carpets and a snooty atmosphere seem to clash with the blue collar vibe of the jersey clad fans present in Radio City Music Hall, and the ones watching from their battle-worn easy chairs in living rooms around America.

It seems that the draft no longer caters to the demographics that helped make the event, and the NFL, successful in the first place. Jim Corbett of USA TODAY described the pomp and circumstance of the occasion as “Monday Night Football meets the Academy Awards.” Excuse me for not getting overly excited that a football event is being turned into a black tie gala. Next thing you know there will be a strict dress code for fans, and I don’t think the old lucky jersey and nacho stained sweatpants combo will make the cut.

The draft disappoints. While Mel Kiper, Jr.’s hair is always entertaining, his analysis is not. Watching him and John Gruden aimlessly argue over the potential of Tim Tebow seems like an exercise in futility, and it certainly does not distract from the fact that no blockbuster deals were being done. Similarly, watching Jimmy Clausen sit in the best available box while his draft stock plummets does not make up for the fact that picks seem to take forever. While the draft definitely has value, it could benefit from giving the hype machine a well deserved break. Too much of a mediocre thing is definitely enough.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Biggest QB Bust Debate Verdict

May 26, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Bleacher Fan.

Wow, Ryan Leaf actually wins something.

I stated at the end of my intro that I had a feeling this could be very entertaining. Folks, I was right!

Before I even had a chance to delve into yesterday’s arguments my inbox was flooded with a back and forth commentary from Bleacher Fan and Babe Ruthless. Both debaters are very passionate

So, let’s take a look at Mr. Leaf and Mr. Russell, both of whom are busts. That much is quite obvious!

I had not ever seen the two dubious quarterback’s numbers side by side. They are equally awful. Bleacher Fan highlights the stats of both players. Babe Ruthless is humorously infatuated with Russell’s weight, both in the debate and in the email exchange. In fact, when submitting the debate for an editorial read by our editor, the subject read, “JaMarcus Russell is a fatty.” Maybe he really does need to be a contestant on the Biggest Loser.

This debate isn’t about reality shows, though, which is a good thing because no one would watch these two busts in a reality show. Also, the two arguments concentrated on whether or not off-the-field transgressions and attitude issues should come into play in evaluating the bust-factor of these two players. I actually believe that is an entirely separate issue. As humorous as Leaf’s rant was back in 1998, I decided to not let it, or any other “shenanigans,” enter into my decision-making.

Let’s simply take a look at the numbers, because they are ultimately why I decided that Ryan Leaf was the bigger bust, and Bleacher Fan is the winner.

In six fewer games, Leaf threw 13 MORE INTERCEPTIONS (36-23). A touchdown to interception ratio of 14-36 is a LOT worse than the 18-23 ratio that Russell currently has. Babe countered that Russell played in a pass-happy era. While that may be the case, the statistics show that Leaf only threw 25 fewer passes than Russell, yet 12 more interceptions. These numbers really don’t lie. It’s also important to note that Leaf won EXACTLY FOUR games as a starter! Four games! That is ridiculous!

When fans think of a player who is a bust, fairly or unfairly, they think of Ryan Leaf. I tend to think that’s a fair label just by his performance, or lack thereof, on the field. It really doesn’t matter that Leaf was the second player drafted, as opposed to Russell being chosen first. We are all old enough to remember that Leaf was highly regarded, even more regarded than Russell was when he was coming out of college. If it were any other year, I think we could have seen Leaf selected first. But, he was in the draft with Peyton Manning, and history is currently showing how good Manning is. And how bad Leaf was.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Biggest QB Bust Debate

May 25, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Bleacher Fan.

Over the past 15 years there have been two high draft picks in the NFL that stand out above all others because they are very high profile busts. Maybe you’ve had this conversation with your friends. And maybe you can already tell which two players we are going to discuss today without me having to go any further.

Ryan Leaf was the second overall pick in the 1998 NFL Draft. You may recall that Peyton Manning was the first pick that year. Imagine how different the NFL landscape would be right now if the picks had been reversed. Actually, most experts felt there really wasn’t a whole lot of difference between the two at the time of the draft. Ha! All Manning has done is go on to become one of the greatest quarterbacks in league history. And Leaf? Well… I’ll leave that analysis to Bleacher Fan.

JaMarcus Russell was the first overall pick in the 2007 NFL Draft. After racking up big numbers at LSU, he was drafted by the Raiders. Many experts thought his arm strength would carry him a long way in the NFL. They were wrong. After three years in the NFL, Russell is currently without a job after recently being cut by the Raiders.

So that leads us to today’s debatable issue: Who is the bigger bust, Ryan Leaf or JaMarcus Russell?

Bleacher Fan will argue that Leaf is the bigger bust while Babe Ruthless will argue that Russell is the bigger bust.

I’ve got a feeling this could be entertaining!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Most Surprising MLB Move in April Debate…The Brilliant or Desperate Zambrano Move

April 28, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan.

My oh my how the mighty have fallen.

Once a proud and emotional leader of the Chicago Cubs, the team’s supposed ace is now relegated to bullpen duty, making Carlos Zambrano the highest paid setup man in the history of baseball.

As a starter, Zambrano’s early season ERA was over eight, and manager Lou Piniella had quite enough. Who can blame him? Not only was Zambrano’s ERA out of control, his signature emotion was gone. In short, Sweet Lou did not believe that Zambrano CARED about his struggles. Of the long list of things that make Sweet Lou’s face twitch, apathy is near the top. While seemingly deserved, the most surprising move in April is Zambrano’s sudden move to the pen.

Zambrano has stunk this season, even after a couple of improved performances out of the pen. His ERA is still a ridiculous 6.85. After giving up ten home runs all of last season in 169.1 innings, Zambrano has already served up four dingers in just 22 innings. Yikes.

Aside from the rough start from the right hander, it is generally hard to blame Lou for the move. Zambrano has always had “the stuff” of an ace, but never the psyche. He is prone to intense emotional outbursts and to extreme pitching efficiency when he is on, using few pitches to set down the side in order. Since the Cubs have blown some leads early in the season, primarily because a young bullpen was unable to hold leads late in the game, the gaping hole in the late innings was obvious. Zambrano has the best pitches and mentality for the bullpen of any other player in the starting rotation.

Zambrano fits because the alternatives are not good. Carlos Silva and Tom Gorzelanny, surprising Cubs starters for the 2010 campaign, are actually pitching well in the rotation right now. Randy Wells is probably the staff’s best pitcher, and Ryan Dempster its most consistent. The odd man out is clear, and Zambrano belongs in the pen.

The problem is that pesky – and enormous – contract. He is due $17.875M in 2010, $18M in 2011, and $19.25M. Obviously this is the salary of an ace, not a setup guy. But, he also has a full no trade clause. The Cubs are stuck with Zambrano, and they must get SOME value out of him. As a result, along with Zambrano’s lip service to “doing whatever is needed to help the ballclub,” the best way to make Zambrano valuable is to use him out of the pen.

The move is not just surprising for its clarity and swiftness, but also for its mismanagement. Of course it’s the right decision; of course something needed to be done quickly. But Zambrano somehow still maintains that this is a temporary move. For this to be effective either as a psychological ploy, or to strengthen a weak bullpen, Zambrano must be convinced of its seriousness. Failure to do so neuters the effectiveness of this move.

Cubs’ fans should hope that the move sticks, regardless of the weird contract situation. Zambrano makes more sense as a bullpen pitcher than a starter, even with a no hitter under his belt. The less time Zambrano has on the mound, the less time he has to get mad at his defense and frustrated with the catcher recommended pitches. It is good for his blood pressure – and for the fans’ blood pressure.

Winning has a way of making surprising moves look brilliant. Losing makes them look knee-jerk and desperate. I am curious to find out which type of move this is. My Sports Geek hunch tells me it’s brilliant.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best 2010 NFL Draft Week Debate… Carroll Does Well in First Draft

April 26, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Bleacher Fan.

The three-day marathon called the NFL Draft is finally over. I was skeptical at first, but I must admit, going against what I argued not too long ago… the three day format was a success. I was proven wrong. I probably watched more draft coverage this year than ever before. And apparently I am not alone, as ESPN had record ratings. However, today we are going to recap the draft and debate which team had the best overall draft. How did your team fare? Babe Ruthless and Bleacher Fan are making two good choices as Babe is now a big Jimmy Clausen fan, and Bleacher Fan will join millions of others with his man crush on Tim Tebow. I, however, am going in a different direction. I am headed out West where Pete Carroll and the Seattle Seahawks had themselves a very good draft.

Sports Geek and I are long time readers of Peter King’s Monday Morning Quarterback. And this morning, he has a fascinating review of the draft and some of the behind the scenes chatter. He and I agree that the Seahawks did a lot to improve their team. With their first pick and the sixth overall, they drafted Oklahoma State tackle Russell Okung. Now, I know the average fan can’t name the names of the offensive lineman, but this guy appears to be the real deal. He was a two-time All-American in Stillwater and is rather huge. He is 6-feet 5-inches and weighs 307 pounds. Longtime Seahawk tackle Walter Jones is expected to retire in the coming days, and Seattle expects Okung to just slide right into the tackle position manned by Jones for thirteen years.

With the thirteenth pick safety Earl Thomas out of Texas was selected. Now, some of you Big XII fans should be familiar with Thomas. While he played safety in college, the Seahawks believe he can play some corner if needed, and that’s what separated him from the other safety candidates like former USC Trojan Taylor Mays. Carroll has been under fire from Mays for somehow causing his draft stock to fall. Mays was under the assumption that Carroll may draft him. But, Taylor, you aren’t in sunny California anymore… that’s not how it works outside the fantasy known as the University of Southern California. The training wheels are off!

I really like the second round pick, and 60th overall, of Notre Dame receiver Golden Tate. Sports Geek earlier this year wrote an argument about Tate. It’s hard to argue against some of the things he did in South Bend, and under major scrutiny at that. He’s a little on the small side, but I’ve just got a feeling he could do well in Seattle. I was actually a little surprised he fell all the way to 60.

It was a great first draft for Carroll in Seattle. He filled needs with the first three picks, but he also traded away picks in order to get running backs Leon Washington and LenDale White. If those two guys can stay healthy and focused, they should succeed in the northwest. The NFC West is up for grabs, and this draft will go a long way in helping Seattle compete in the West.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Biggest Pre-Draft Move Debate… Spring Cleaning in the Steel City

April 23, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Sports Geek.

There have been some big moves in the weeks leading up to the 2010 NFL Draft.

Included within those moves are face lifts for two teams that have traded away the very people who for the last decade, in the San Diego Chargers (who released LaDanian Tomlinson) and the Philadelphia Eagles (who traded away Donovan McNabb).

In terms of blockbuster deals, no trade has been bigger than that of Brandon Marshall, who was sent to the Miami Dolphins after a season in Denver where his on-field success was unfortunately overshadowed by several issues that have somewhat diminished the perception of what this dangerous receiver can consistently do.

But with all of those transactions, where teams have put forth the off-season efforts they hope will improve their organization, the team facing the biggest changes to their team is doing so as a RE-active, rather than PRO-active, measure. The biggest pre-draft moves of the NFL 2010 season were the penalty-induced suspensions and transaction of Santonio Holmes and Ben Roethlisberger.

First comes the story of Santonio Holmes, who has been in legal trouble, it seems, since entering the league in 2006. He has admitted to having sold drugs prior to seriously pursuing football, and since 2006 has been hit with assault charges, domestic violence charges, drug charges, and is once again facing a lawsuit for allegedly throwing a glass at a woman in a bar.

And then there is Ben Roethlisberger, who recently was under investigation for the second time with regard to sexual assault allegations.

You know – Really CLASSY actions!

As a result of their respective misdeeds, both Holmes and Roethlisberger are facing suspensions for the first four to six weeks of the upcoming regular season. This presented a very big problem for the Steelers, because both Holmes and Roethlisberger were integral parts of the Pittsburgh offense.

Holmes, a former first-round draft pick (and the MVP of Super Bowl XLIII) was coming off of one of the best seasons in his career as a Wide Receiver. Meanwhile, Roethlisberger had been developing into one of the most successful quarterbacks in the game today. In fact, the Steelers saw fit to reward Roethlisberger’s success back in 2008 with an eight-year, $102M contract, making him one of the highest paid players in the entire league.

Despite that success from two of the Steelers’ most promising offensive stars, patience with the oft scandalized tandem has finally run out, prompting the team to retool their offense.

Two weeks ago, the Steelers dumped Santonio Holmes and all of his baggage in a trade with the New York Jets, where all they received in return was a fifth-round pick in this weekend’s draft. Clearly, Holmes’ stock had drastically plummeted in the eyes of Pittsburgh and its fans. To value a player with Holmes’ on-field credentials as only being worth a fifth-rounder speaks volumes with regard to their opinion of his character.

Following the announcement of Roethlisberger’s suspension, the Steelers began talks in trying to trade him away as well. To this point, they have not been able to find a suitable partner, but there is a long way to go before the season begins, and a lot of negotiation can take place in the meantime. Don’t forget, also, that even IF Roethlisberger remains on the team, he will not be available to suit up until week SEVEN. That is a lifetime when you consider that the NFL season is only 16 weeks long!

So much for the Steelers’ original plans.

The Rooney family has been very vocal in their displeasure of the situation that Holmes and Roethlisberger put them in, and has taken measures to demonstrate that there is no room within the Steelers organization for thoughtless and reckless behavior, no matter how successful those players may have been on the field. As a Cleveland native you won’t hear me say this often, but I must applaud the Pittsburgh Steelers for having taken such a strong stance in these matters!

The message that the Roger Goodell (now with the support of at least one well-respected owner) is sending is a simple one – being a part of the NFL is a privilege, and must be taken seriously. When a player puts their career at risk by participating in these foolish (and possibly criminal) activities, they put the whole organization at risk. These moves by the Steelers (which may not be over yet) have clearly made the most impact, not only in Pittsburgh, but to the entire NFL.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The New NFL Draft Format Debate… Too Much of a Good Thing IS a Good Thing

April 20, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Loyal Homer.

The NFL Draft is not exactly a made for TV event. At least, it wasn’t until ESPN approached then-commissioner Pete Rozelle 31 years ago with an idea. “Broadcast the NFL Draft and people will watch it,” or something like that, was probably the conversation’s opening line. No matter how the conversation started, it ended with Rozelle agreeing to make the NFL more accessible by broadcasting the draft, a decision that helped transform the league into an unstoppable force in American sports culture. The draft is so popular now with football fans that any change in the format runs the risk of being received negatively. Nevertheless, the league and its primary draft broadcasting partner, ESPN, have teamed up to change the format and approach to the NFL draft. And the draft will actually now be better that it ever was before.

To start, let’s just dispel the notion that the draft did not need to change. Of COURSE it needed to change. The world is changing in how people consume media. You can get draft information and content from virtually every sports-related Web site on the interwebs now (including, obviously, this one). ESPN is in competition with those media outlets that wish to compete with them in their distribution of information about the draft. The only logical thing to do is evolve the medium they control in order to retain eyeballs where they – and their sponsors – want them. Changing the NFL draft to a three day long event captivates fans for a longer period of time, in addition to dealing with the modern realities of media consumption.

It is true that overexposure is sometimes a death knell to once popular events. This new draft format, however, is not overexposure. It is an improved product, especially for Sports Geek’s like me.

First, consider that Thursday nights in America are the one night every week where the most people are watching television. What better place for the first night of the draft, especially considering it features its most universally popular off-season content. The most popular sport in the country welcomes players from another sport among the country’s most popular, college football. Casual and diehard fans alike find this first night of the NFL draft quite appealing. For ESPN, and the NFL, to have an entire night devoted solely to the first round sets up for an intense and dramatic evening and creates a new level of achievement in sports… provided that NFL rookie was a first-day draftee. Now, being a “first-day draft pick” carries a certain caché – and income level. It’s up the players what they make of the new sought-after moniker.

As rounds two and three are drafted on Friday night – the rounds often full of the most valuable draft picks, where talent and financial investment are most properly aligned – some of the casual fans fall by the wayside, but the interest from the diehards picks up substantially. In fact, the second round is viewed by some to be just another first round now that the format is changed. Patriots coach Bill Belichick has publically stated his belief that the extra time will afford each front office more time to research players who are still available, evaluate where competitors sit in draft position, and determine if they wish to move up in the second round or trade down to collect picks. Hmm, sounds a lot like how the first round of the draft is treated.

Belichick continued, “In the past, you kind of rolled into that round. Now, to actually stop and have the whole night to sit there and think about it and talk to other teams and develop a new strategy. Everybody does that on the second day; now we have three days. It’s a different dynamic.”

The man knows what he is talking about, having built several Super Bowl championship teams. The idea that teams get extra time to evaluable talent and competitive position means teams gain more control over the draft, and are able to better execute a strategy. As a fan, I love this idea because it appears to give my favorite team a chance to get better. I am in favor of any draft modifications that give my team the opportunity to get better.

If the second round is similar to the first in its approach because of the extra study time, then the fourth round – which drafts on Saturday, along with the remaining rounds in the draft – can be leveraged by teams in much the same way. Teams may have to spend additional time on their respective drafts boards and scouting, but now if a player gets drafted, the decision will have been more carefully considered when teams have another night to sleep on a decision. Overall, this greatly improves each team’s ability to build a winner.

Fans also get additional intrigue and excitement. No longer is the first day of the draft the most anticipated. All of the analysis can be hashed out after the first round, then new needs are uncovered and new strategies hatched. It is as much about football as political and business maneuvering.

Getting drafted as a player means something more than it used to now. Sure drafted players get a contract and longer look than a free agent does, but imagine being a round five draftee this year. Teams will be positioning themselves to get the players they believe have fallen through the cracks of the previous rounds. Every decision is more carefully weighed, so every pick is put through a new, more intense ringer than ever before.

Fans can now not only better judge their team’s decisions and trust that better decisions will be made, they will also get more time to learn about their team’s newest players. The media will have more time to give background stories and information on these new players, to provide scouting reports and discuss a player’s fit within a particular scheme. It is a free country, so fans that are bored by that do not have to watch. But for those that are intrigued, it is a big win.

Fans win, teams win, and players win. Seems like if those three stakeholders are winners, the league is, too.

The new format is good if you’re a Sports Geek like me, a passion-filled loudmouth like Bleacher Fan, a success-at-all-costs fan like Babe Ruthless… and even a heavily biased Loyal Homer, my opponent in this fine debate. Plus, the NFL takes up more airspace in a down time for the league, sells more ad space on the league-owned cable channel, and fills up its own network with more content than it has ever had before. If there was ever a sports-related win-win (win-win-win), the NFL’s new draft format is just that. For fans, organizations, and the league alike.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The New NFL Draft Format Debate… A Change For the Worse

April 20, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Sports Geek.

You have been hearing about the NFL Draft for months now. You’ve been reading scouting reports, the needs of each team, mock drafts, and even debates about mock drafts. You are curious to see where the players from your favorite college team will be drafted. Now, it’s time to get ready for a time honored ESPN tradition, and watch hours of coverage on Saturday and Sunday. What? Come again? The draft starts on Thursday? You cannot be serious? What was wrong with the way it was?

I realize that Thursday night isn’t exactly “Must-See-TV” like it was during its peak run in the mid 1990s, and there really won’t be much on TV except for an NBA playoff game. But the point of my argument is that there was absolutely nothing wrong with the old format of the draft. That was my initial reaction when this change was announced several months ago, and my mind hasn’t changed.

Now, I think I know what Sports Geek is going to write in the opposing side of the debate. The point will be made that more eyes will be watching in prime time on Thursday night. That, in itself, remains to be seen. Personally, I loved having the first round of the draft take place on Saturday (even when it began starting a little later a couple of years ago) because, generally speaking, I had nothing to do on Saturday. I’m not one of those guys who has a big draft day party barbecue. But I certainly do sit my behind on the couch and watch the draft, as I would have nothing else to focus on. That’s a good thing because the draft tends to drag on and on, with the first round usually lasting around five hours.

On Thursday night, I will still watch some of the draft. But it’s going to be hard for me to focus my entire attention on the draft, and it’s doubtful I will be awake for the pick number 32. I personally don’t have kids, but those that have children will be tending to the weekday activities with their children, whether it is helping mini-Sports Geek with his homework or reading Lil’ Bleacher Fan-ette her bedtime story… or something of the like. This tends to not be an issue on a Saturday.

Also, at what point does the draft begin to become overkill, not only the fans, but for the teams as well? Many are saying that the new format will give teams more time to reassess the needs of their team after the first day, and after the second day. Haven’t these needs been assessed in the previous months? Many hours have been spent scouting and identifying targeted players. Is the extra time really going to help? No! All it is going to be is bring self-doubt into the picture, and bring in a large portion of over-analysis to an event that already borders on overkill.

Besides, who really wants to listen to Mel Kiper, Jr. for three days?

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Mock Draft Value Debate… A Complete Waste of Time

April 13, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.

There are some things in life that are a complete waste of time. Sitting in a doctor’s office for hours. Being on hold with a customer service representative. Going to a school board meeting and waiting for big news while the members discussed personnel issues in executive session, only to find out two hours later that they have decided to table the discussion until a later date (this happened to me last night). All of these things are a complete waste of time. But nothing absolutely kills the value of my life more than reading the ENDLESS and USELESS supply of mock drafts out there.

Here’s a perfect example.

One of the Web sites that I visit regularly is the Atlanta-Journal Constitution’s Web site. Over the course of the past two months the Atlanta Falcons’ beat writer, D. Orlando Ledbetter, has provided a mock draft on a weekly basis. I always give it a quick run through, but have never read it in-depth until preparing for this argument. In his mock draft on April 2, appropriately titled Mock Draft 6.0, Ledbetter projected that, among other things, Tim Tebow would be drafted ninth by the Buffalo Bills. Hmmm, I found that interesting at the time. But a week later, in Mock Draft 7.0, he projected that Tebow was not going to be drafted in the first round. He was listed under the “On the Fringe” label. Had Tebow really fallen that far in a week’s time? Maybe he never should have been that high? What did or didn’t he do to take such a nosedive? Heck, perhaps Ledbetter read my argument about Tim Tebow from a couple of weeks ago and was convinced that Tebow is not going to be a good NFL quarterback. Who knows! These are all questions that no one can legitimately answer.

Go to any sports Web site and you are going to find an abundance of “speculative” information. This includes a countless array of mock drafts. I dare you to find two mock drafts out there that are EXACTLY the same. Go ahead. I double dare you!!! If I published my own mock draft, would you read it? You may if you are a frequent visitor (which we hope you are!). But you might not believe a word of it. Why should my version be any better than the other guy’s? Why is it any worse for that matter? It sure isn’t an exact science. It is not even close to Bracketology.

Mock drafts do not take into account that trades may actually happen on draft day. What if St. Louis decides to trade the number one pick to a team that wants to trade up and draft Ndamukong Suh? That has a major trickle down effect because Detroit, with the second pick, is obviously not going to draft Sam Bradford because they already have a young quarterback in Matthew Stafford. What does Detroit do then? Do they trade the pick? Do they take Gerald McCoy? Who knows! It’s a crap shoot!

We all like to read various articles throughout the day to help pass the time at work. You know you have probably read a mock draft from Todd McShay or Mel Kiper, Jr. at some point. I know I have. But that does not mean I believe there is value to a mock draft. I may read about Jesse James’s last fling in The National Enquirer while waiting in line at Wal-Mart, but that doesn’t mean I believe there is value.

Let it be said that this debate is my official mockery of mock drafts!!!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share